Contact us
New to Clearway?
It's quicker and easier than calling, to send us a message via the website.
Send a messageWe're in the office
Send us a message or call us and we'll get back to you shortly.
We're currently away
Send us a message and we'll get back to you shortly.
Find the team you're looking for below if you need to speak to us.
To reach our Trespass Response Team out of hours
01405 455 018Vacant Property Services
01322 332211Temporary & Mobile CCTV
01405 455032Alarm Receiving Centre
0370 770 6811Illegal Trespass & Commercial Financial Recovery
0800 002 9049Illegal Trespass Response Team Out Of Hours
01405 455 018Fire & Security Systems
0121 561 1214CCTV footage is commonly used in UK court cases, and provided the material is authentic, hasn’t been tampered with or edited, and is relevant to the case, most courts will welcome this as unbiased evidence of an incident or crime.
In fact, the police deem CCTV useful in 65% of criminal investigations, and the probability of a crime being solved rises from 23% to 48% when there is surveillance available. This is even more relevant in serious cases such as homicides, with Scotland Yard using CCTV cameras in as many as 95% of their investigations. [1]
However, if there are any doubts about the authenticity of CCTV footage, or if it has been exposed to possible editing or tampering, it may be considered inadmissible regardless of how strong the evidence is.
Contents
| CCTV Requirement | Relevance |
|---|---|
| Authentic footage of actual events | CCTV images must be original or verified copies with no potential to have been edited or altered in any way. |
| Tamper-proof storage | Videos must be stored correctly and securely without access from anyone without the requisite authorisation. |
| Date and time stamps | Proves when the footage was recorded and whether this correlates with other accounts of the event or incident. |
| Link to the case | Only CCTV footage with a proven connection to the case can be shown in court. |
Footage presented by any party in a court case must comply with data privacy and GDPR, because footage that hasn’t been recorded legally and in compliance will usually be disregarded.
Any CCTV camera that could potentially record a crime or conflict should comply with:
Organisations might be asked to demonstrate how they have protected the privacy rights and freedoms of any individuals included in their recordings, and to confirm that they are registered with the Information Commissioner’s Office (ICO) and comply with its CCTV guidelines.
Judges will only allow CCTV to be shown if it has been lawfully obtained, and even if there is a serious criminal prosecution, and the footage is technically accurate, it might be inadmissible if:
In addition to the legalities, CCTV must be of sufficient quality to be reliable, be time-stamped, and be protected from improper handling or editing.
Footage that doesn’t have a clear chain of custody or that may have been tampered with is often inadmissible in court, which means that, if CCTV is the only evidence available, a prosecution or case might be dismissed altogether. [2]
Clearway’s legal compliance team says, ‘CCTV footage can be powerful, and show an irrefutable event or incident or prove the perpetrator of a crime or the reality of a workplace incident that has led to a tribunal. However, maintaining a solid chain of custody and proving the footage is original are vital.
Get a quote
Poorly maintained CCTV with low-quality images won’t be considered reliable enough as evidence, which means an outdated camera, grainy images, or blurry captures will typically be disregarded because they don’t have sufficient detail to prove what happened.
Other issues, such as malfunctions, inoperable parts of a CCTV system, or problems with lines in the video, may mean CCTV isn’t useful, or that some recorded events are obscured, and therefore the whole footage isn’t admissible.
Keeping CCTV cameras properly maintained and serviced, and calling an engineer quickly when a surveillance solution experiences issues is the best way to ensure this doesn’t happen and that, if a crime or break-in does occur, you’ll be able to present clear evidence to support a swift resolution.
No, because recordings that don’t have any supporting proof of when they were taken, or footage that could have been edited or changed, can’t be considered 100% reliable and therefore could be rejected.
Any edits whatsoever, even cutting out sections of footage that aren’t relevant, could mean CCTV isn’t accepted by the courts. That’s because, to be legally valid and trustworthy, videos need to be continuous without gaps or splices.
Generally, CCTV that serves as evidence will be passed to the relevant authorities or parties, but organisations in possession of CCTV footage that is part of a court case should retain it and store it securely until the case has been finalised or they have been officially advised that the footage can be destroyed.
Get a quote
It looks like you’ve submitted your information in the wrong section of our website. No problem—if you’re looking to apply for a job, you can do so by viewing our current vacancies. Click below to find and apply for roles through the proper channel.
View our current vacancies